Documentation review #1511
Documentation review #1511
Conversation
|
🤖 Hi @tleonhardt, I've received your request, and I'm working on it now! You can track my progress in the logs for more details. |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1511 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 98.81% 98.79% -0.03%
==========================================
Files 23 23
Lines 4961 4961
==========================================
- Hits 4902 4901 -1
- Misses 59 60 +1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📋 Review Summary
This pull request provides a comprehensive and much-needed overhaul of the documentation. The changes significantly improve clarity, consistency, and accuracy across the board. The addition of links to the API documentation and examples is particularly helpful.
🔍 General Feedback
- Excellent work updating the documentation to reflect the latest changes and best practices.
- The consistent use of links to the API documentation is a great improvement.
- The updated examples and command outputs are very helpful for users.
- I found a couple of minor typos, which I've pointed out in inline comments.
- I have one question about the removal of the
mkdocstringsblock indocs/features/clipboard.md.
|
@gemini-cli /review |
|
🤖 Hi @tleonhardt, I've received your request, and I'm working on it now! You can track my progress in the logs for more details. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📋 Review Summary
This is an excellent and comprehensive documentation update. The changes significantly improve the clarity, accuracy, and navigability of the documentation. The updates to command outputs, version recommendations, and explanations of complex topics like readline compatibility are particularly valuable.
🔍 General Feedback
- The addition of links to the API documentation, examples, and external resources is a huge improvement for user experience.
- Updating the command output examples makes the documentation much more accurate and trustworthy.
- The improved explanations and use of admonitions (like
!!! warning) for tricky subjects are very helpful.
I found only a couple of very minor typos, which I've left as suggestions. Overall, this is a fantastic contribution to the project.
|
@gemini-cli /review |
|
🤖 Hi @tleonhardt, I've received your request, and I'm working on it now! You can track my progress in the logs for more details. |
…d put in a draft for the 2.x -> 3.x upgrade info
|
@gemini-cli /review |
|
🤖 Hi @tleonhardt, I've received your request, and I'm working on it now! You can track my progress in the logs for more details. |
|
@gemini-cli /review |
|
🤖 Hi @tleonhardt, I've received your request, and I'm working on it now! You can track my progress in the logs for more details. |
…eing rich objects and info on HelpFormatter classes
I made a thorough read through our existing documentation and attempted to improve it.
The kinds of things I was looking for include: